|
FAQ Online Registration
UW-Eau Claire Student Senate
resolution
UW-Stout Student Senate
Resolution
January 2011
Update
from Brennan Center
Reference List
from 9 states
NCSL on OLVR
PEW study on AZ and WA
Common Cause supports OLVR
Find your Reps
here
This page: http://tinyurl.com/OLVRWI
Resources for Non-Profits
Things you can do online:
Register for
Selective Service
Check your voter
registration
Change your DL address
Apply
for Social Security
Renew your professional license
Buy a Wis.
hunting or fishing license
Register for organ
donation
E-file your taxes
LRB on
History of DL
requirements
Letter to
Editor August 2009
Letter
to editor March 2009
Madison Common Council passes
resolution supporting OLVR
For information, contact Paul Malischke malischke@yahoo.com
|
AB-365 for
Paperless Instant-Check Online Voter Registration was introduced November 9,
2011
Section by section analysis
Authored by Rep.
Berceau and Senator
Risser, and cosponsored by 21 others
This
7 minute movie
explains how and why
Online Voter Registration
Will Help Clerks, Help Voters, and Save $$
Wisconsin should improve the voter registration system
by offering paperless online real-time voter registration. The direct financial payback
will be immediate for municipalities, as it will save the clerk’s time by
avoiding manual entry of data from a huge stack of paper forms.
Follow the successful model of other states
Arizona and Washington were first to successfully institute
online voter registration (OLVR).
Arizona’s system has been in place since 2002, and in 2008,
39% of those who registered used the online system.
Washington’s system has
been in effect since January 2008, and is highly acclaimed by their Secretary of
State (see
FAQ
and testimony and
attachments
to congressional committee). Kansas, Oregon, Colorado, Louisiana, Utah,
and Indiana also have working systems. Nevada has a system for Clark
County and plans to roll it out for the whole state. North Carolina is developing a system. California
has passed enabling legislation and is developing a system. To ensure an accurate and secure system, there are
these limitations:
- Only those with a
driver’s license or
state
identification card can use the online system.
- Most states require instant verification of
information submitted before the application is completed
- Online registration closes when open registration
closes (20 days before the election in Wisconsin).
HAVA checks
In 2008, Wisconsin had a well-publicized suit on how
to handle the “HAVA checks”, the comparison of voter registrations to the
driver’s license database. In contrast, the states that have online
registration handle this automatically as part of the process. This
minimizes the extra effort needed on either the part of the voter or the
election administrator for the matching process, and minimizes controversy.
Benefits for election administrators
The data submitted online is more complete and accurate
than on paper forms. Online registration significantly reduces the costly
and heavy workload of entering data from paper forms, most of which are
received when other election tasks are mounting. In 2008, clerks
struggled to process forms in time to get voters on the poll list. If the
bulk of registrations are handled automatically, our election administrators
will be able to deal promptly with the paper forms from other voters.
From a
report from PEW Center on the States, August 2009:
“In
Maricopa County, Arizona, a paper registration form costs at least 83 cents
to process, versus an average of 3 cents for a registration completed
online.”
Benefits for Voters
For voters, online real-time registration means a more timely,
accessible, and reliable way to register, with immediate confirmation that
the registration has been accepted. This eliminates worries about not being
on the poll list due to faulty handling of a paper form, or failing the HAVA
check.
States that have systems or have passed
bills, in order of activation
142 page report on Washington and Arizona's systems
| State |
Status |
Bill or Act |
Comments |
|
Arizona |
active since July 2002 "EZvoter" |
ARS 16-111 16-112 16-152.E |
SOS
FAQ;
summary;
press release 2008. Info on AZ from
CA hearing.
Security |
|
Washington |
Passed 91-6, 30-17 on April 9, 2007. Active since
1/1/2008. |
HB 1528
29A.08.123; Rule
434-324-031 (both are short) |
SOS
FAQ.
Same timelines as mail registration. Cost to implement:
$279,000 (see attachments below)
Testimony
to congress &
attachments.
PowerPoint |
|
Kansas |
Launched by Sec. of State July 2009 |
appears to be accomplished w/o legislation |
Open
to new & existing voters until 14 days before election.
Instant matching to come later. |
| Oregon |
passed by House 45-11, Senate 19-6, 6/23/09, signed by Gov.
Aug. 6 2009.
Turned on March 1, 2010 by
SOS |
H 2386, 3 pages.
Enrolled bill
SOS
Press Release |
Oregonian on House vote.
Oregonian on Senate vote. Will use
$217,000 (based on Washington's cost) of HAVA funds. Uses
Captcha &
VeriSign SSL |
| Colorado |
legislature passed 4/29/09, Signed into law 5/15/09, requires OLVR April 1, 2010 |
HB-09-1160.
Appropriation of $142,000 - See JBC Analysis link on top of bill's page |
Passed by the House
60 to 4, senate is unanimous.
Editorial. Governor's
Press release. Denver Daily
News. With change of address, requires postcard to old
address. Closes 29 days before election. |
| Louisiana |
passed by legislature 6/21/09, signed by Governor 6/29/09; requires OLVR April 1, 2010 |
HB 520, becomes
Act 187, 4 pages |
passed by House 67-23, & Senate 35-0,
Will use $300,000 from HAVA |
|
Utah |
Launched May 2010. Passed by legislature 2/12/09, Gov. signed 3/20/09 |
S.B. 25,
"will not require additional
appropriations." |
senate 22-2, House 58-14.
Deseret News |
|
Indiana |
Launched July 1 2010.
Passed 4/29/09, signed
5/11/09 |
HB 1346 becomes
Act 1346 |
cost indeterminable, will use existing $$. Closes 29 days before
election. PSA
mp3. Can use internet-enabled
cell phone. |
|
Nevada |
Available
in Clark county Sept. 2, 2010 |
appears to be accomplished w/o legislation |
Includes instant matching with DL data. Will expand to entire state. |
| California |
passed Sept. 30, 2008; 54-18, and 22-15. Scheduled for Dec. 2011,
then
delayed until 2014 |
SB 381
(2007-8 session), 3 pages |
Hearing Nov 2007;
press release. Closes 15 days before election. Requires
immediate matching of DOB and ID#. |
| California |
passed Oct. 2011 to allow counties to have OLVR until state
is ready |
SB397 |
|
| Maryland |
Passed and signed by Governor, May 2011.
$250,000 available to implement. |
HB
740 Passed Senate 41-5, House 97-42. |
limited to those with DL, except military and overseas may use
SS#, and voters already registered may use voter # |
States that have web-assisted fill, print, sign, & mail
Bills that have been introduced but not passed,
alphabetically
| State |
Status |
Bill or Act |
Comments |
| Alabama |
Introduced Jan 26, 2010; reported out of committee 3/3 |
HB 424 |
"The Secretary of State shall use federal Help
America Vote Act funds to implement and maintain secure Internet
voting registration" |
| California |
Sent to Gov. July 2011 |
A-1357 |
Would allow counties to set up OLVR |
| Georgia |
Passed by Senate 33-20 |
SB
406 |
requires immediate confirmation of DL or ID# |
| Hawaii |
Introduced 1/13/2012 |
HB 1755 |
includes appropriation of $500,000 |
| Hawaii |
Passed House and Senate unanimously and sent to Governor May, 2011.
Gov vetos since no $ were appropriated. |
HB 545 |
requires immediate confirmation of DL or ID #; uses digital
signature |
| Michigan |
passed by House Dec 17, 2009, 68 aye, 36 no |
S 0347, same as
H 4539 |
Those who do not have DL or state ID would be
treated as registration by mail.
Detroit News |
| Minnesota |
bill submitted |
S.F. 661, sec. 2 & 4 |
SOS
legislative proposals |
| Mississippi |
Introduced Jan 17, 2011 |
SB2549 |
limited to those with DL or state ID card |
| Montana |
Introduced Dec. 3, 2010 |
SB 33 |
limited to those with DL or state ID card |
| Nebraska |
Introduced Jan. 7, 2011 |
LB168 |
limited to those with DL or state ID. Security
clause at end |
| Nevada |
passed by Assembly; amended version
passed by Senate; died at end of session June 2009 |
AB82, 72 pages,
3rd reprint. See Section 20 |
Enabling legislation. May be re-introduced in 2011. |
| New Jersey |
introduced Jan. 2011 |
A-1229 |
|
| New York |
Introduced Jan 4, 2012 |
S5237 |
Applicant could use SS# or DMV #. Election
Board shall get digital signature from DMV. |
| Ohio |
Passed by House Nov 19, 2009 |
HB 260 |
editorial |
| Texas |
Passed by House May 5, 2011.
Vote is 138 to 1. |
HB 2814 |
Estimated
cost to implement $140,000 |
| Wisconsin |
Died when session ended April 22, 2010. Introduced March 25, 2010,
public hearing March 31 |
AB-892
and
SB-645 |
Section-by section analysis. Madison passes
resolution urging OLVR |
| Congress |
Oct
21 Hearing
by House Committee on House Administration |
HR 1719 |
Lofgren.
AJR-36 resolution in California legislature to endorse 1719 |
| Congress |
referred to House
Committee on House Admin |
HR
4449 |
Republican Kevin McCarthy, CA. Reimburse states for OLVR. |
| Congress |
May 4, 2010 referred to
Senate Rules & Admin. Committee |
S.3301 |
Ron Wyden Oregon; John Kerry MA. Reimburse up to $150,000
for OLVR |
From testimony of Katie Blinn,
Assistant Director of
Elections
on behalf of Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed, to the
Congressional Committee on House
Administration, Oct 21, 2009:
“The online voter registration
system has also been very popular with election administrators. It has
reduced their workload because the information comes in electronically. They
don’t have to spend so much time manually entering the information from
paper forms. This also reduces the risk of mistyping a voter’s name,
address, date of birth, etc.”
“If the applicant
provides an incorrect or nonexistent driver’s license, the program will not
allow the applicant to advance to the next screen and finish the
application. While it might initially seem that this form of registration is
more subject to fraud, it is actually less because it
controls whether the user can advance through the application.”Web page by Paul Malischke
malischke@yahoo.com Last updated
January 23, 2012
|