|
PEW
Elections Index includes OLR.
Methodology p.36
PEW
update on OLR Oct 2012
NCSL on OLVR
May 8, 2013
FELN update
Oct 2012 Senate committee hearing -
7
minutes
January 2011
Update
from Brennan Center
USA Today Oct 14, 2012
Reference List
from 9 states
FAQ Online Registration
PEW study on AZ and WA
UW-Eau Claire Student Senate
resolution
UW-Stout Student Senate
Resolution
Find your Reps
here
2011 video on AB-365
This page: http://tinyurl.com/OLVRWI
Things you can do online:
Register for
Selective Service
Check your voter
registration
Change your DL address
Apply
for Social Security
Renew your WI professional license
Buy a Wis.
hunting or fishing license
Register for organ
donation
E-file your taxes
LRB on
History of DL
requirements
Letter to
Editor August 2009
Letter
to editor March 2009
For information, contact Paul Malischke malischke@yahoo.com
|
Electronic Voter Registration
Will Help Clerks, Help Voters, and Save $$
Find your state
legislator and get contact info
April 17, 2013
Press conference - Representative Terese Berceau announces (at the 5
minute mark) that a bill for electronic voter registration will soon be
circulated seeking co-sponsors.
5 minute MP3 file of the Oct 2012 Senate Hearing
Wisconsin should improve the voter registration system
by offering paperless online real-time voter registration. The direct financial payback
will be immediate for municipalities, as it will save the clerk’s time by
avoiding manual entry of data from a huge stack of paper forms.
Follow the successful model of 13 other states
Arizona and Washington were first to successfully institute
online voter registration (OLVR).
Arizona’s system has been in place since 2002, and in 2008,
39% of those who registered used the online system.
Washington’s system has
been in effect since January 2008, and is highly acclaimed by their Secretary of
State (see
FAQ
and testimony and
attachments
to congressional committee). Kansas, Oregon, Colorado, Louisiana,
Utah, Indiana, Nevada, New York, Maryland, California, and South Carolina
also have working systems. Connecticut, Hawaii, Virginia, and
New Mexico have passed legislation and are developing systems. To ensure an accurate and secure system, there are
these limitations:
- Only those with a
driver’s license or
state
identification card can use the online system.
- Most states require instant verification of
information submitted before the application is completed
- Online registration closes when open registration
closes (20 days before the election in Wisconsin).
HAVA checks
In 2008, Wisconsin had a well-publicized suit on how
to handle the “HAVA checks”, the comparison of voter registrations to the
driver’s license database. In contrast, the states that have online
registration handle this automatically as part of the process. This
minimizes the extra effort needed on either the part of the voter or the
election administrator for the matching process, and minimizes controversy.
Benefits for election administrators
The data submitted online is more complete and accurate
than on paper forms. Online registration significantly reduces the costly
and heavy workload of entering data from paper forms, most of which are
received when other election tasks are mounting. In 2008, clerks
struggled to process forms in time to get voters on the poll list. If the
bulk of registrations are handled automatically, our election administrators
will be able to deal promptly with the paper forms from other voters.
From a
report from PEW Center on the States, August 2009:
“In
Maricopa County, Arizona, a paper registration form costs at least 83 cents
to process, versus an average of 3 cents for a registration completed
online.”
Benefits for Voters
For voters, online real-time registration means a more timely,
accessible, and reliable way to register, with immediate confirmation that
the registration has been accepted. This eliminates worries about not being
on the poll list due to faulty handling of a paper form, or failing the HAVA
check.
States that have systems or have passed
bills, in order of activation
142 page report on Washington and Arizona's systems
| State |
Status |
Bill or Act |
Comments |
Fiscal Note |
|
Arizona |
active since July 2002 "EZvoter" |
ARS 16-111 16-112 16-152.E |
SOS
FAQ;
summary;
press release 2008. Info on AZ from
CA hearing.
Security |
Startup cost was $100,000. Annual cost is $125,000.
See PEW
report, page 92 |
|
Washington |
Passed 91-6, 30-17 on April 9, 2007. Active since
1/1/2008. |
HB 1528
29A.08.123; Rule
434-324-031 (both are short) |
SOS
FAQ.
Same timelines as mail registration.
Testimony
to congress &
attachments.
PowerPoint 2011
video from director of Elections |
Cost to implement: $279,000 (see attachments
in Comments column) |
|
Kansas |
Launched by Sec. of State July 2009 |
appears to be accomplished w/o legislation |
Open
to new & existing voters until 14 days before election.
Instant matching to come later. |
|
| Oregon |
passed by House 45-11, Senate 19-6, 6/23/09, signed by Gov.
Aug. 6 2009.
Turned on March 1, 2010 by
SOS |
H 2386, 3 pages.
Enrolled bill
SOS
Press Release |
Oregonian on House vote.
Oregonian on Senate vote. of HAVA funds. Uses
Captcha &
VeriSign SSL |
Will use
$217,000 (based on Washington's cost) |
| Colorado |
legislature passed 4/29/09, Signed into law 5/15/09, requires OLVR April 1, 2010 |
HB-09-1160 |
Passed by the House
60 to 4, senate is unanimous.
Editorial. Governor's
Press release. Denver Daily
News. With change of address, requires postcard to old
address. Closes 29 days before election. |
Appropriation of $142,000 - See JBC Analysis link on top of bill's page.
HB-09-1160. |
| Louisiana |
passed by legislature 6/21/09, signed by Governor 6/29/09; requires OLVR April 1, 2010 |
HB 520, becomes
Act 187, 4 pages |
passed by House 67-23, & Senate 35-0 |
Will use $300,000 from HAVA |
|
Utah |
Launched May 2010. Passed by legislature 2/12/09, Gov. signed 3/20/09 |
S.B. 25 |
senate 22-2, House 58-14.
Deseret News |
"will not require additional
appropriations." |
|
Indiana |
Launched July 1 2010.
Passed 4/29/09, signed
5/11/09 |
HB 1346 becomes
Act 1346 |
Closes 29 days before
election. PSA
mp3. Can use internet-enabled
cell phone. |
cost indeterminable, will use existing $$. |
|
Nevada |
Available
in Clark county Sept. 2, 2010 |
appears to be accomplished w/o legislation |
Includes instant matching with DL data. |
Rolled out county by county.
Completed Sept 8, 2012. total cost is $248,000 |
|
Maryland |
Article on Launch Aug. 7, 2012 |
HB
740 Passed Senate 41-5, House 97-42. |
limited to those with DL, except military and overseas may use
SS#, and voters already registered may use voter #. |
fiscal note: $250,000 to implement, $80,000 annual cost |
| New York |
Launched August 16, 2012 |
apparently
without legislation |
If DMV's records do not reflect your current name,
address, DOB, you must first correct this information on DMV records
before processing an online Voter Registration Application. |
|
| California |
Launched September 19, 2012. |
SB 381
(2007-8 session), 3 pages followed by
SB-397, passed Sept. and signed Oct. 2011 |
Hearing Nov 2007;
press release. Closes 15 days before election. Requires
immediate matching of DOB and ID#. |
|
|
South Carolina |
Launched Oct. 2, 2012 |
H*4945, passed unanimously, signed June 18, 2012
Cleared by US DOJ |
Instant verification of DL or DMV ID card.
3,000 registrations in first 20 hours |
"Costs are minimal and have been absorbed in the Agency
budget." |
| Georgia |
Signed by Gov. May 2, 2012 |
SB 92 |
omnibus bill proposed by
Sec. of State |
|
| Connecticut |
Signed by Gov. May 31, 2012 |
Public Act 12-56 Section 10 is online registration effective Jan
1, 2014. This Act also provides for election
day registration. |
requires electronic signature from DMV or other state agency |
|
| Hawaii |
signed by Governor July 6, 2012. Effective 2016 |
HB1755 |
|
bill appropriates $500,000 |
| Virginia |
passed
House 93-5, passed
Senate 40-0. Signed by
Gov 3/18/13 |
HB-2341
final text |
requires that DOB, SSN, and either DL or DMV ID, is verified,
but not instantly. House has 67
Rep. & 32 Dems, One Ind. Senate has 20 of each. |
Fiscal Note: $81,000 to implement, $20,000 per year maintenance |
| West Virginia |
Signed by Gov May 2, 2013 |
SB 477 |
|
fiscal note: to implement - $77,000 |
| New Mexico |
signed by Gov. 4/1/2013 |
HB-497
final version |
limited to updating existing registration |
Fiscal note: no fiscal impact |
California and Louisiana also allow those without a driver
license or DOT ID card to use the online system to fill-in, print, sign, and
mail the form.
States that have online fill, print, sign, & mail,
open to all eligible electors:
Delaware,
Washington DC, and Wisconsin.
Ohio has online
change of address
Bills that have been introduced but not passed,
alphabetically
| State |
Status |
Bill or Act |
Comments |
| Arkansas |
|
HB-1650 |
|
| Illinois |
|
HB-2886, SB-1707, SB-2370 |
|
| Massachusetts |
|
HB581, HB-634,
SB-313 |
|
| Michigan |
|
SB-28 |
|
| Missouri |
|
HB-232 |
|
| Montana |
|
HB-557, SB-206 |
|
| New Jersey |
AB-2870 passed by Assembly Oct 18, 2012 |
SB-2168. |
Excellent model for other states |
| New York |
OLR launched August
2012 w/o legislation. |
A-149, A-187, S-619, S-1991 |
|
| Ohio |
|
HB-78, SB-20 |
|
| Pennsylvania |
Passed by committee 3/19/2013,
passed by Senate 4/71/2013, 9 to zero. |
SB-37 |
|
| Texas |
HB 216, introduced 11/26/2012 |
HB-216, HB-313, SB-315 |
|
| Wisconsin |
AB-365 introduced Nov 9, 2011
AB-892 Introduced March 25, 2010,
public hearing March 31 |
AB-365
AB-892
and
SB-645 |
Section-by section analysis. Madison passes
resolution urging OLVR |
| Congress |
Oct
21 Hearing
by House Committee on House Administration |
HR 1719 |
Lofgren.
AJR-36 resolution in California legislature to endorse 1719 |
| Congress |
referred to House
Committee on House Admin |
HR
4449 |
Republican Kevin McCarthy, CA. Reimburse states for OLVR. |
| Congress |
May 4, 2010 referred to
Senate Rules & Admin. Committee |
S.3301 |
Ron Wyden Oregon; John Kerry MA. Reimburse up to $150,000
for OLVR |
From testimony of Katie Blinn,
Assistant Director of
Elections
on behalf of Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed, to the
Congressional Committee on House
Administration, Oct 21, 2009:
“The online voter registration
system has also been very popular with election administrators. It has
reduced their workload because the information comes in electronically. They
don’t have to spend so much time manually entering the information from
paper forms. This also reduces the risk of mistyping a voter’s name,
address, date of birth, etc.”
“If the applicant
provides an incorrect or nonexistent driver’s license, the program will not
allow the applicant to advance to the next screen and finish the
application. While it might initially seem that this form of registration is
more subject to fraud, it is actually less because it
controls whether the user can advance through the application.”Web page by Paul Malischke
malischke@yahoo.com Last updated
May 15, 2013
|