Home About Us/Contact Archives Closed Polls Counting Election Day Reg Gov't Acct Bd Legislation in Wis Madison Online Reg Recall Recounts Registration Deputy

PEW Elections Index includes OLR. Methodology p.36

PEW update on OLR Oct 2012

NCSL on OLVR May 8, 2013

FELN update

Oct 2012 Senate committee hearing - 7 minutes

January 2011 Update from Brennan Center

USA Today Oct 14, 2012

Reference List from 9 states

FAQ Online Registration

PEW study on AZ and WA

UW-Eau Claire Student Senate resolution

UW-Stout Student Senate Resolution

Find your Reps here

2011 video on AB-365

This page: http://tinyurl.com/OLVRWI

Things you can do online:

Register for Selective Service

Check your voter registration

Change your DL address

Apply for Social Security

Renew your WI professional license

Buy a Wis. hunting or fishing license

Register for organ donation

E-file your taxes

LRB on History of DL requirements

Letter to Editor August 2009

 Letter to editor March 2009

For information, contact Paul Malischke malischke@yahoo.com


Electronic Voter Registration Will Help Clerks, Help Voters, and Save $$

Find your state legislator and get contact info

April 17, 2013 Press conference - Representative Terese Berceau announces (at the 5 minute mark) that a bill for electronic voter registration will soon be circulated seeking co-sponsors.


5 minute MP3 file of the Oct 2012 Senate Hearing


Wisconsin should improve the voter registration system by offering paperless online real-time voter registration.  The direct financial payback will be immediate for municipalities, as it will save the clerk’s time by avoiding manual entry of data from a huge stack of paper forms.

Follow the successful model of 13 other states

Arizona and Washington were first to successfully institute online voter registration (OLVR).   Arizona’s system has been in place since 2002, and in 2008, 39% of those who registered used the online systemWashington’s system has been in effect since January 2008, and is highly acclaimed by their Secretary of State (see FAQ and testimony and attachments to congressional committee).  Kansas, Oregon, Colorado, Louisiana, Utah, Indiana, Nevada, New York, Maryland, California, and South Carolina also have working systems.   Connecticut, Hawaii, Virginia, and New Mexico have passed legislation and are developing systems.  To ensure an accurate and secure system, there are these limitations:

  • Only those with a driver’s license or state identification card can use the online system.
  • Most states require instant verification of information submitted before the application is completed
  • Online registration closes when open registration closes (20 days before the election in Wisconsin).

HAVA checks

In 2008, Wisconsin had a well-publicized suit on how to handle the “HAVA checks”, the comparison of voter registrations to the driver’s license database.  In contrast, the states that have online registration handle this automatically as part of the process.  This minimizes the extra effort needed on either the part of the voter or the election administrator for the matching process, and minimizes controversy.

Benefits for election administrators

The data submitted online is more complete and accurate than on paper forms.  Online registration significantly reduces the costly and heavy workload of entering data from paper forms, most of which are received when other election tasks are mounting.  In 2008, clerks struggled to process forms in time to get voters on the poll list.  If the bulk of registrations are handled automatically, our election administrators will be able to deal promptly with the paper forms from other voters. 

From a report from PEW Center on the States, August 2009:  In Maricopa County, Arizona, a paper registration form costs at least 83 cents to process, versus an average of 3 cents for a registration completed online.

Benefits for Voters

For voters, online real-time registration means a more timely, accessible, and reliable way to register, with immediate confirmation that the registration has been accepted.  This eliminates worries about not being on the poll list due to faulty handling of a paper form, or failing the HAVA check.

States that have systems or have passed bills, in order of activation

142 page report on Washington and Arizona's systems

State Status Bill or Act Comments Fiscal Note
Arizona active since July 2002 "EZvoter" ARS 16-111    16-112 16-152.E SOS FAQ; summary; press release 2008.  Info on AZ from CA hearing Security Startup cost was $100,000.  Annual cost is $125,000.  See PEW report, page 92
Washington Passed 91-6, 30-17 on April 9, 2007.   Active since 1/1/2008. HB 1528 29A.08.123; Rule 434-324-031 (both are short)   SOS FAQ. Same timelines as mail registration. 

Testimony to congress & attachments PowerPoint

2011 video from director of Elections

 Cost to implement: $279,000 (see attachments in Comments column)
Kansas Launched by Sec. of State July 2009 appears to be accomplished w/o legislation Open to new & existing voters until 14 days before election.  Instant matching to come later.  
Oregon passed by House 45-11, Senate 19-6, 6/23/09, signed by Gov. Aug. 6 2009.  Turned on March 1, 2010 by SOS H 2386, 3 pages.  Enrolled bill

SOS Press Release

Oregonian on House vote.  Oregonian on Senate vote.  of HAVA funds.  Uses  Captcha & VeriSign SSL Will use $217,000 (based on Washington's cost)
Colorado legislature passed 4/29/09, Signed into law 5/15/09, requires OLVR April 1, 2010 HB-09-1160 Passed by the House 60 to 4, senate is unanimous.  Editorial.  Governor's Press release.  Denver Daily News.  With change of address, requires postcard to old address.  Closes 29 days before election.   Appropriation of $142,000 - See JBC Analysis link on top of bill's page. HB-09-1160.
Louisiana passed by legislature 6/21/09, signed by Governor 6/29/09; requires OLVR April 1, 2010 HB 520, becomes Act 187, 4 pages passed by House 67-23, & Senate 35-0  Will use $300,000 from HAVA
Utah Launched May 2010. Passed by legislature 2/12/09, Gov. signed 3/20/09 S.B. 25 senate 22-2, House 58-14.  Deseret News "will not require additional appropriations."
Indiana Launched July 1 2010.  Passed 4/29/09, signed 5/11/09 HB 1346 becomes Act 1346  Closes 29 days before election.  PSA mp3.  Can use internet-enabled cell phone. cost indeterminable, will use existing $$.
Nevada Available in Clark county Sept. 2, 2010 appears to be accomplished w/o legislation Includes instant matching with DL data. Rolled out county by county.  Completed Sept 8, 2012.  total cost is $248,000
Maryland Article on Launch Aug. 7, 2012 HB 740

Passed Senate 41-5, House 97-42.

limited to those with DL, except military and overseas may use SS#, and voters already registered may use voter #.  fiscal note:  $250,000 to implement, $80,000 annual cost
New York Launched August 16, 2012 apparently without legislation If DMV's records do not reflect your current name, address, DOB, you must first correct this information on DMV records before processing an online Voter Registration Application.  
California Launched September 19, 2012. SB 381 (2007-8 session), 3 pages

followed by SB-397, passed Sept. and signed Oct. 2011

Hearing Nov 2007; press release. Closes 15 days before election.  Requires immediate matching of DOB and ID#.  
South Carolina Launched Oct. 2, 2012 H*4945, passed unanimously, signed June 18, 2012 Cleared by US DOJ Instant verification of DL or DMV ID card.  3,000 registrations in first 20 hours "Costs are minimal and have been absorbed in the Agency budget."
Georgia Signed by Gov. May 2, 2012 SB 92 omnibus bill proposed by Sec. of State  
Connecticut Signed by Gov. May 31, 2012 Public Act 12-56 Section 10 is online registration effective Jan 1, 2014.  This Act also provides for election day registration. requires electronic signature from DMV or other state agency  
Hawaii signed by Governor July 6, 2012.  Effective 2016 HB1755   bill appropriates $500,000
Virginia passed House 93-5, passed Senate 40-0.  Signed by
Gov 3/18/13
HB-2341 final text requires that DOB,  SSN, and either DL or DMV ID, is verified, but not instantly. House has 67 Rep. & 32 Dems, One Ind.  Senate has 20 of each. Fiscal Note: $81,000 to implement, $20,000 per year maintenance
West Virginia Signed by Gov May 2, 2013 SB 477   fiscal note: to implement - $77,000
New Mexico signed by Gov. 4/1/2013 HB-497  final version limited to updating existing registration Fiscal note:  no fiscal impact


California and Louisiana also allow those without a driver license or DOT ID card to use the online system to fill-in, print, sign, and mail the form.


States that have online fill, print, sign, & mail, open to all eligible electors:  Delaware, Washington DC, and Wisconsin.

Ohio has online change of address


Bills that have been introduced but not passed, alphabetically

State Status Bill or Act Comments
Arkansas   HB-1650  
Illinois   HB-2886, SB-1707, SB-2370  
Massachusetts   HB581, HB-634, SB-313  
Michigan   SB-28  
Missouri   HB-232  
Montana   HB-557, SB-206  
New Jersey AB-2870 passed by Assembly Oct 18, 2012 SB-2168. Excellent model for other states
New York OLR launched August 2012 w/o legislation. A-149, A-187, S-619, S-1991  
Ohio   HB-78, SB-20  
Pennsylvania Passed by committee 3/19/2013, passed by Senate 4/71/2013, 9 to zero. SB-37  
Texas HB 216, introduced 11/26/2012 HB-216, HB-313, SB-315  
Wisconsin AB-365 introduced Nov 9, 2011

AB-892 Introduced March 25, 2010, public hearing March 31

AB-365

AB-892 and SB-645

Section-by section analysis.  Madison passes resolution urging OLVR
Congress Oct 21 Hearing by House Committee on House Administration HR 1719 Lofgren.  AJR-36 resolution in California legislature to endorse 1719
Congress referred to House Committee on House Admin HR 4449 Republican Kevin McCarthy, CA.  Reimburse states for OLVR.
Congress May 4, 2010 referred to Senate Rules & Admin. Committee S.3301 Ron Wyden Oregon; John Kerry MA.  Reimburse up to $150,000 for OLVR

From testimony of Katie Blinn, Assistant Director of Elections on behalf of Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed, to the Congressional Committee on House Administration, Oct 21, 2009:

“The online voter registration system has also been very popular with election administrators. It has reduced their workload because the information comes in electronically. They don’t have to spend so much time manually entering the information from paper forms. This also reduces the risk of mistyping a voter’s name, address, date of birth, etc.”

“If the applicant provides an incorrect or nonexistent driver’s license, the program will not allow the applicant to advance to the next screen and finish the application. While it might initially seem that this form of registration is more subject to fraud, it is actually less because it controls whether the user can advance through the application.”

Web page by Paul Malischke malischke@yahoo.com  Last updated May 15, 2013